Just Type and Press Enter

Wednesday, May 13, 2015

[The Big Picture] India’s World : Charity and Geo - Politics in Nepal quake relief

Summary:
  • Indian relief and rescue opertaions in Nepal began within four hours of series of devastating earthquakes hitting that country. There has been a remarkable mobilisation of Indian Army, Indian Air Force and NDRF to provide rescue and relief in Nepal. Field hospitals have been set up by the Army and medical teams have been sent to relatively remote areas. Indian aircrafts have been helping Nepal in providing supplies and evacuating people. These operations have continued at a relentless pace. Although help has been pouring into Nepal from all over the world, the Indian relief efforts remain incomparable. In the midst of rescue operatioins in Nepal, there have been a series of media commentaries especially in the western press suggesting that Indian and Chinese aid have hidden political agenda in it and the two countries are trying to influence that country. Statements of Nepali leaders, bracketing unprecidented disaster response of India with that of countries, have also not helped.
  • Both India and Nepal want to establish a good image in Nepal, and win the hearts of the Nepalese people and extending a hand of help to Nepal at this juncture is important for image-building, and to build their respective influence in the country. Although the current focus is firmly on helping the survivors get medical attention and necessities, eventually India and China are expected to play crucial roles in the long and expensive job of helping reconstruct the country itself. That’s when the geopolitical wrangling over this strategically important nation is likely to intensify.
  • For years India’s influence over Nepal has waned, as the Chinese have gained traction. Despite a history of political, economic and social intimacy, and the fact that Nepal’s currency is pegged to the Indian rupee, successive Indian governments failed to engage with their Nepali counterparts. The Chinese downturn in Nepal began in earnest in 2008, after Beijing lost its most reliable partner in the country—the monarchy, which controlled the armed forces. Analysts believe the Chinese have supported the country’s ruling Maoist party after their guerrilla war that deposed the king.
  • There has been some discontent over the unsurprising access that Indian media were getting on the relief sorties being run by the Indian air force planes. Some people allege that the air force is more interested in rescuing stranded Indians rather than helping evacuate quake affected people. Some people are also saying that the Indian air force planes have virtually taken control of the airport, thus slowing down other international aid efforts. Some western experts have alleged that the outsized coverage of the Indian effort had put to shade heroic efforts made by the Nepalese army, its armed police and the local officials who have tried their best to work in very difficult circumstances. Meanwhile, Nepal’s health ministry has said it will allow only a few teams of health workers in the country, and others will be asked to return home.
  • The earthquake struck Nepal at a time when its political parties were fighting over the provisions of an overdue new constitution to cement the country’s transition from Hindu monarchy to secular democracy. Sovereignty and geopolitics were part of the national debate.
  • There are also concerns related to the Western presence in Nepal, especially among supporters of right-wing Hindu parties and the bureaucracy, which is dominated by so-called high-caste Hindus. They see Western nations as having a conversion agenda in Nepal. Nepal may not be able to deal with the aftermath of the earthquake on its own, but it cannot accept assistance at the cost of the nation’s sense of sovereignty and self-respect.
  • India, the traditional power in the region, launched Operation Maitri soon after the quake on Saturday. It has sent the most help so far, deploying 13 aircraft and more than 500 rescuers as well as water, food, equipment and medical supplies. China, increasingly making inroads in Nepal through everything from infrastructure investment to increased tourism, also pledged all-out assistance within hours of the disaster. India’s rival, Pakistan, also has sent four cargo planes full of supplies.
  • While China’s relief efforts may not rival India’s in Nepal quite yet, its offers of investment in the power industry and other infrastructure could give India some substantial competition. However, India and China have been saying that they have no such intentions behind these rescue and relief operations.
Source: RajyaSabha Tv

NCERT Compilation [Work in Progress for more Compilation]

Economy Compilation Link: Click Here
Environment Compilation Link: Click Here
Geography Compilation Link: Click Here
History Compilation Link: Click Here
World History Compilation Link: Click Here
Polity Compilation Link: Click Here
Science Compilation Link: Click Here
Other Important Compilation Link: Click Here
All In One Link: Click Here

Other Compilation are work in progress so for updation visit here...
Keep Calm & Download :)

Special Thanks to Rajesh & Teamwork

Tuesday, May 12, 2015

[Q&A] Most of the countries have a shared navigational system, then why is India developing its own when it can collaborate with the US or EU or Russia? Also, since the IRNSS is capable of covering South Asian region only, how much strategic advantage and autonomy will it give to India when compared with navigational systems of the US, EU, Russia and China?

Abhijit Singh Replies[Maritime Issues, Littoral Security]: 
  • To begin, it is important to point out that a satellite navigational system is an onerous enterprise that takes enormous capital and technological investment - not to mention years of research and experimentation - to fully operationalise. The high investment needed is one reason why countries favour developing navigation systems on a shared basis, so that the labour and costs involved can be distributed among the various partner. 
  • In practice, the side that seeks the greatest strategic and security gains develops the navigational system at huge costs and then offers it to other partners as a facility for ‘subscription’. The rest simply sign up, knowing fully well that they benefit from it but still remain at the mercy of the dominant power that retains control over vital components of the navigational system.
  • A case in point is China’s indigenous satellite navigation system known as Beidou. To make the project a viable enterprise, Beijing has got many Southeast Asian countries to sign up for it. However, questions are being raised on whether it will be able to attract a large enough clientele to make the system a viable proposition. On the other hand, the act of signing up to the Beidou by regional states is being construed in some quarters as a strategic concession to China. Beijing, meanwhile, is constrained by the fact that despite putting 16 navigation and four experimental satellites into space, the project's coverage is still limited to Southeast Asia. For a global cover, the system needs an additional 40 satellites in orbit and another round of huge capital investment.
  • In effect, all sea-going nations have a choice – to either develop their own navigational system or join an existing facility, in which case they remain mere consumers. India could, in theory, develop a navigational system in collaboration with the US or EU or even Russia, but can be almost certain that vital systems will remain under the practical control and authority of the bigger partner (as we have seen in the case of co-development of other technologies in recent years). Unfortunately, if an aspiring state chooses to go alone, it rarely has the investment capability or the technological wherewithal to develop a global facility.
  • The Indian Regional Navigation Satellite System (IRNSS) with a constellation of seven satellites and a coverage limited to the Indian subcontinent and South Asia is what India can presently afford, given that New Delhi does not want to be dependent on a foreign power when it comes to military navigation. Apart from the many civil and commercial benefits that accrue from the system, there is no denying the sense of greater autonomy and control over an essential strategic asset.
Source: idsa.in

Monday, May 11, 2015

[Part 1] Useful Image Collection of 2015

1. PBD (9th January 2015):Major Concentrations of Indian Dispora around the World:

2. National Girl Child Day (24 January 2015):

3. Obama's India visit Some of the key demands from each side:

4. Millennium Development Goals:

5. Rail Budget:

6. Economic Survey 2013-2014

7. The National Judicial Appointments Commission in other Countries:

8. Kyasanur Forest Disease:

9. Earthquake: India Map of Seismiczone
Earthquake Scale

10. 304 Section Apply in Salman case:

11. UK Elections:

12. About larks:

13. Siachin Glacier:

14. New 3 Schemes:

Source: The Hindu,Wiki,ET,AIR,Teamwork